Psssst!
Merry Christmas!
Thursday, December 24, 2009
Thursday, May 21, 2009
In celebration of a year without a new post
I thought I'd throw one out there and see if anyone responds.
Monday, May 12, 2008
Prayer Request
As a general rule, I am not prone to making prayer for complete strangers and drastic world events a high priority. As the number of natural disasters and weather related fatalities has piled up over the past few months, I have been more convicted by that failing. As Christians, I believe we are called to have compassion for all people, and getting desensitized by modern media does not excuse us from this. If you have a minute (and you clearly do, or you wouldn't be browsing the blog) bow your head and pray for the families suffering in the aftermath of the Myanmar cyclone, the earthquake in South China, and closer to home, the victims of the recent storms and tornadoes in our own backyard. God does not need to hear our prayer to care for those who are suffering, but perhaps we need to do the praying in order to do the same.
Tuesday, May 06, 2008
Philippians 1:1-11
Here are a few first thoughts about Philippians 1 before we talk about it tonight. If you read this before we meet, hopefully you can begin to raise your own questions and discover your own insights into Paul's letter that you can then share with us.
First off, a link to the text.
Philippians begins, as do most of Paul's letters, with his offering "grace and peace...from God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ" to his intended readers. Let's remember that Paul was in prison as he wrote this, yet he offers grace and peace from God. Paul is not the giver of grace and peace, but rather a fellow recipient, and that impresses me. When my outward circumstances are less than favorable I am not filled with "grace and peace", but Paul is even while in prison. Is peace really on offer to us full time, no matter what is going on in our lives?
Paul goes on to express his love and care for the Philippians and to pray for them, that their "love may abound more and more in knowledge and depth of insight, so that [they] may be able to discern what is best and may be pure and blameless until the day of Christ, filled with the fruit of righteousness that comes through Jesus Christ—to the glory and praise of God."
What a wonderful idea--that love may abound in knowledge and depth of insight. Wendy and I have been watching a lot of House lately. House is a wonderful show, but one of its primary tenants is that people lie pretty much all the time for their own self-serving ends. House is profoundly aware of this, much moreso than anyone else on the hospital's staff, and as a result, it seems, he is miserable and drives anyone who would seek to care for him away.
Cameron, on the other hand, tends to believe the best of people, and time and time again she is disappointed and House proved correct in his fundamental assumptions about human nature. Cameron is likable, but naive, while House is wise but tortured. Furthermore, this concept is borne out by Solomon in Ecclesiastes 1:18: "For with much wisdom comes much sorrow; the more knowledge, the more grief."
Paul's take, however, runs contrary to this. He asserts that love may abound in knowledge and depth of insight. Who's wrong?
I'm going to start from them premise thatHouse can't possibly be wrong if something is in the Bible then it's true, and that if two Biblical statements seem contradictory, they only appear so, and both, in reality, express the truth. In the beginning of Ecclesiastes, the author writes, "I devoted myself to study and to explore by wisdom all that is done under heaven." I think the key is in this phrase: "under heaven". As long as Solomon studies man and man's behavior, the more he learns, the more he suffers. House is the great student of man. Of course, saying that, another fictional student of man comes to mind--Sherlock Holmes. Holmes, though, was addicted to opium, whereas House is addicted to Vicodin, which is a derivative of opium. Hmmm. Could it be that studying man will drive one to despair?
It doesn't seem that Paul, then, is encouraging the Philippians to study or grow wise in the ways of man, but rather to study and grow wise in the ways of God. What does that kind of wisdom offer? The ability "to discern what is best and...be pure and blameless until the day of Christ, filled with the fruit of righteousness that comes through Jesus Christ." That's pretty huge, eh? I wonder if my life would be any better if I had the ability to consistently discern what was best? (Yeah, that's rhetorical.) How about the fruit of righteousness? I suspect that's something that would be good to have in my life as well. But if it would be good for me, think how it would be for you, for my coworkers and students, for my wife! If my life was filled with the fruit of righteousness, would that not do more to bring glory and praise to God and draw others to him than anything else I could possibly do? Can my cleverest argument compete with fruit of righteousness and abounding love? I don't think so.
May our prayer for ourselves and one another be the same as Paul's for the Philippians.
First off, a link to the text.
Philippians begins, as do most of Paul's letters, with his offering "grace and peace...from God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ" to his intended readers. Let's remember that Paul was in prison as he wrote this, yet he offers grace and peace from God. Paul is not the giver of grace and peace, but rather a fellow recipient, and that impresses me. When my outward circumstances are less than favorable I am not filled with "grace and peace", but Paul is even while in prison. Is peace really on offer to us full time, no matter what is going on in our lives?
Paul goes on to express his love and care for the Philippians and to pray for them, that their "love may abound more and more in knowledge and depth of insight, so that [they] may be able to discern what is best and may be pure and blameless until the day of Christ, filled with the fruit of righteousness that comes through Jesus Christ—to the glory and praise of God."
What a wonderful idea--that love may abound in knowledge and depth of insight. Wendy and I have been watching a lot of House lately. House is a wonderful show, but one of its primary tenants is that people lie pretty much all the time for their own self-serving ends. House is profoundly aware of this, much moreso than anyone else on the hospital's staff, and as a result, it seems, he is miserable and drives anyone who would seek to care for him away.
Cameron, on the other hand, tends to believe the best of people, and time and time again she is disappointed and House proved correct in his fundamental assumptions about human nature. Cameron is likable, but naive, while House is wise but tortured. Furthermore, this concept is borne out by Solomon in Ecclesiastes 1:18: "For with much wisdom comes much sorrow; the more knowledge, the more grief."
Paul's take, however, runs contrary to this. He asserts that love may abound in knowledge and depth of insight. Who's wrong?
I'm going to start from them premise that
It doesn't seem that Paul, then, is encouraging the Philippians to study or grow wise in the ways of man, but rather to study and grow wise in the ways of God. What does that kind of wisdom offer? The ability "to discern what is best and...be pure and blameless until the day of Christ, filled with the fruit of righteousness that comes through Jesus Christ." That's pretty huge, eh? I wonder if my life would be any better if I had the ability to consistently discern what was best? (Yeah, that's rhetorical.) How about the fruit of righteousness? I suspect that's something that would be good to have in my life as well. But if it would be good for me, think how it would be for you, for my coworkers and students, for my wife! If my life was filled with the fruit of righteousness, would that not do more to bring glory and praise to God and draw others to him than anything else I could possibly do? Can my cleverest argument compete with fruit of righteousness and abounding love? I don't think so.
May our prayer for ourselves and one another be the same as Paul's for the Philippians.
Monday, May 05, 2008
Self Serving Tribble
Star Trek themed eighties band?
Anyhoo, I have begun occasionally posting vaguely bible-centered blog posts from time to time. Rather than force anyone who is not interested to read the post, I'll just throw a link up here.
Oh, and I vote for Ephesians for this week if no one has any preference, and if our fearless leader hasn't already prepped another book.
Anyhoo, I have begun occasionally posting vaguely bible-centered blog posts from time to time. Rather than force anyone who is not interested to read the post, I'll just throw a link up here.
Oh, and I vote for Ephesians for this week if no one has any preference, and if our fearless leader hasn't already prepped another book.
Wednesday, April 30, 2008
Genesis 50
I figured since I'd already typed them up, I might as well post my notes on Genesis 50. I tried to clean up any typos, but if any are left, please be merciful.
The first fourteen verses of Genesis 50 don't strike me much. Israel dies, Joseph has him embalmed and takes him back to the cave near Mamre in Canaan where Abraham, Sarah, Isaac, Rebekah, and Leah are buried. The embalming seems out of keeping with Judiasm, but given the length of the trip, it's probably the only plausible way to do it with a corpse.
Things get more interesting around verse 15, where we see that Joseph's brothers are nervous that maybe now that Dad's gone Joseph is finally going to exact his revenge. So they send him a message that is purportedly from their father that he should forgive them. There's no indication that this is true, but neither that it's a lie. What we're told is that when Joseph gets it, he weeps. His brothers come and prostrate themselves before him; "We are your slaves," they say to him. His response is lovely:
To get back to it, though, Joseph has the attitude that I don't even know I'm good enough to wish I possessed. First off, he recognizes that God alone meets out justice, and it isn't Joseph's place to go seeking it. Furthermore, nothing in what he either says or does indicates that he desires revenge upon his brothers. Rather, he goes beyond mercy to absolute generosity toward the men who sold him into slavery. There is, of course, also the point that Joseph, in this case, is able to see a larger picture of God's plan than many of us are fortunate to glimpse. He sees how his own suffering brought about the salvation of many (gee, foreshadowing much?) and he sees that this plan was good. I pray that I can cling to that wisdom--the wisdom that God's plan is ultimately very, very good--when I'm in the midst of my own struggles.
When Joseph was getting ready to die, he was sure that God would take his brothers to the land He promised to Abraham, and he insisted that when they went, they take his bones with them. So he died, was embalmed, and placed in a coffin in Egypt.
Let's note that he was "placed in a coffin" and not "placed in a tomb. His body wasn't interred, it was...well, stuck in a box, and judging by his station, I'd wager a pretty ostentatious box. One commentator points out here that Joesph's coffin must have stood as a monument--a reminder--to God's promise to give the land of Canaan to His people. In fact, we learn in Exodus 13:19 that when the Israelites left Egypt they took Joseph's bones with them. Additionally, in Joshua 24:32 we read: "And Joseph's bones, which the Israelites had brought up from Egypt, were buried at Shechem in the tract of land that Jacob bought for a hundred pieces of silver from the sons of Hamor, the father of Shechem. This became the inheritance of Joseph's descendants."
It's worth noting that when the Godly man Joseph comes and Egypt submits to him, the entire nation is saved from the famine. But when another Godly man comes--Moses--and God's words are rejected, the entire nation is nearly destroyed.
Wendy and I will be talking about what to read next in the coming days. I'll be sure to send out an email when we've made a decision. Ashely has suggested a non-gospel New Testament book. I'm open to that--most especially the New Testament part. Feel free to post any other suggestions in the comments.
The first fourteen verses of Genesis 50 don't strike me much. Israel dies, Joseph has him embalmed and takes him back to the cave near Mamre in Canaan where Abraham, Sarah, Isaac, Rebekah, and Leah are buried. The embalming seems out of keeping with Judiasm, but given the length of the trip, it's probably the only plausible way to do it with a corpse.
Things get more interesting around verse 15, where we see that Joseph's brothers are nervous that maybe now that Dad's gone Joseph is finally going to exact his revenge. So they send him a message that is purportedly from their father that he should forgive them. There's no indication that this is true, but neither that it's a lie. What we're told is that when Joseph gets it, he weeps. His brothers come and prostrate themselves before him; "We are your slaves," they say to him. His response is lovely:
Don't be afraid. Am I in the place of God? You intended to harm me, but God intended it for good to accomplish what is now being done, the saving of many lives. So then, don't be afraid. I will provide for you and your children.Before I get to that response, though, it's worth asking why Joseph weeps. I suppose it's because he realizes that, after all the kindness he's shown his brothers, after all the ways he has disclosed his character to them, they still know him no better than to expect retribution from him. This is a sad fact about sin--it breaks relationships. Even though Joseph has forgiven his brothers, their guilty consciences still prevent them from being fully reconciled to the brother they wronged so terribly.
To get back to it, though, Joseph has the attitude that I don't even know I'm good enough to wish I possessed. First off, he recognizes that God alone meets out justice, and it isn't Joseph's place to go seeking it. Furthermore, nothing in what he either says or does indicates that he desires revenge upon his brothers. Rather, he goes beyond mercy to absolute generosity toward the men who sold him into slavery. There is, of course, also the point that Joseph, in this case, is able to see a larger picture of God's plan than many of us are fortunate to glimpse. He sees how his own suffering brought about the salvation of many (gee, foreshadowing much?) and he sees that this plan was good. I pray that I can cling to that wisdom--the wisdom that God's plan is ultimately very, very good--when I'm in the midst of my own struggles.
When Joseph was getting ready to die, he was sure that God would take his brothers to the land He promised to Abraham, and he insisted that when they went, they take his bones with them. So he died, was embalmed, and placed in a coffin in Egypt.
Let's note that he was "placed in a coffin" and not "placed in a tomb. His body wasn't interred, it was...well, stuck in a box, and judging by his station, I'd wager a pretty ostentatious box. One commentator points out here that Joesph's coffin must have stood as a monument--a reminder--to God's promise to give the land of Canaan to His people. In fact, we learn in Exodus 13:19 that when the Israelites left Egypt they took Joseph's bones with them. Additionally, in Joshua 24:32 we read: "And Joseph's bones, which the Israelites had brought up from Egypt, were buried at Shechem in the tract of land that Jacob bought for a hundred pieces of silver from the sons of Hamor, the father of Shechem. This became the inheritance of Joseph's descendants."
It's worth noting that when the Godly man Joseph comes and Egypt submits to him, the entire nation is saved from the famine. But when another Godly man comes--Moses--and God's words are rejected, the entire nation is nearly destroyed.
Wendy and I will be talking about what to read next in the coming days. I'll be sure to send out an email when we've made a decision. Ashely has suggested a non-gospel New Testament book. I'm open to that--most especially the New Testament part. Feel free to post any other suggestions in the comments.
Monday, April 28, 2008
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)